stock photography
Special Orphan Works Section . . .

Orphan Works legislation proposed recently by the U.S. Copyright Office could seriously affect the businesses of visual artists for many years to come. This page is designed to help you make sense of the proposal. Note that the right column has contact information for representatives and senators serving on committees that will consider orphan works legislation. Many professional organizations are encouraging their members to make their feelings about this issue known to Congress.

stock photography
Owned by The Stock Asylum, LLC 303.473.1926 info@stockasylum.com
Important Orphan Works Resources . . .
Orphan Works Report . . .

The Report on Orphan Works can be downloaded as a PDF file. It explains the Copyright Office's reasons for proposing the legislation.

SAA's Blog . . .

The Stock Artists Alliance has started a blog about Orphan Works. The organization of stock photographers promises up-to-date information.

ASMP's Call to Action . . .

Calling the Orphan works proposal a "disaster" ASMP has issued a "call to action." The organization offers a draft letter to send to federal legislators.

Other Organizations . . .

This page is sponsored by the following concerned organizations:
  
                                        

 


From Amazon.com.
Click on image to Purchase.




Creative Suite 2
Standard upgrade for
Macs (other versions
also available)




Art Directors Annual 82
By Art directors Club





Confessions of an
Advertising Man
By David Ogilvy

 

Or Click here to see
The Stock Asylum's
Creatives' Bookshelf

Orphan Works News  .  .  .

An Orphan Works Breather . . .

The photo industry can forget about orphan works during the Congressional break.
For full story, click here.

One OW Bill Dropped . . .

Orphan Works may be dead for this session of Congress, but it probably will be back.
For full story, click here.

Double Jeopardy . . .

The orphan works proposal has been added to a second legislative package.
For full story, click here.

Orphan Works Campaign . . .

ASMP calls for a letter-writing campaign to help defeat proposed Orphan Works Act.
For full story, click here.

Orphan Works Introduced . . .

An Orphan Works bill has been introduced in the U. S. House of Representatives.
For full story, click here.

Orphan Works Alternatives . . .

ASMP will offer the U.S. Senate some alternatives to the orphan works proposal.
For full story, click here

More Testimony . . .

The record on the orphan works hearing is closed, but negotiations continue. Written testimony from 12 sources has been received since the March 8 hearing.
For full story, click here

Small Copyright Claims . . .

ASMP's Victor Perlman and others testify about creating a small copyright claims court.
For full story, click here

APA Calls for Changes . . .

The advertising photographers group wants significant modifications to proposed orphan works legislation.
For full story, click here
To download APA's proposal, click here

Accidental Orphans . . .

Leif Skoogfors knows what it means to have a photo become an 'orphan work,' even without passage of the proposed legislation.
For full story, click here

Orphan Works In Depth . . .

A proposal by the U.S. Copyright Office could cause major headaches for copyright owners.
For full story, click here

Passionate Testimony . . .

Testimony by Illustrators' Partnership shines light on a number of orphan works concerns.
For full story, click here
To read the IPA testimony, click here

More Meetings Planned . . .

ASMP reported that more closed-door orphan works meetings are scheduled.
For full story, click here

Tentative Progress . . .

Several photography organizations have been invited to orphan works meetings in Washington.
For full story, click here

Orphan Works Hearing . . .

PPA's David Trust testified at the first hearing on the new orphan works proposal. Of four witnesses, he was the only representative of copyright owners.
For full story, click here

The 'Orphan Works' Test . . .

SAA blog challenges readers to find the copyright owners of 144 images.
For full story, click here

David Trust's Testimony . . .

On March 8, David Trust of PPA presented this testimony to a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.
For full story, click here

Other March 8 Testimony . . .

Alan Adler, vice president for legal & government affairs, Association of American Publishers.
To read testimony, click here

Jule L. Sigall, associate register for policy & international affairs, U.S. Copyright Office.
To download PDF of testimony, click here

Maria Pallante, associate general counsel and director of licensing, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation (Guggenheim Museum).
To download PDF of testimony, click here

ASCAP's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

Mercatus' Center written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

Digimarc's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

Directors' Guild written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

GAG's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

Lawrence Lessig's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

National Writers Union written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

SAA's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

BMI's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

Independent Filmmaker's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

IPA's written testimony.
To read testimony, click here

APA's written testimony.
To download APA's testimony, click here

 

 

 

 

Draft of Proposed Orphan Works Act . . .

(Editor's note: the text below is a draft version of an orphan works bill that could soon be introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Lamar S. Smith of Texas. It was made Public May 22.)

 

N109TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION

H. R.________

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for limitation of remedies
in cases in which the copyright owner cannot be located, and for other
purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on____________________

A BILL

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for limitation of remedies in cases in which the copyright owner cannot be located, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the "Orphan Works Act of 2006".

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REMEDIES IN CASES INVOLVING ORPHAN WORKS.
(a) LIMITATION ON REMEDIES.––Chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

"§514. Limitation on remedies in cases involving orphan works

" (a) LIMITATION ON REMEDIES.––

" (1) CONDITIONS.ÑNotwithstanding sections 502 through 505, in an action brought under this title for infringement of copyright in a work, the remedies for infringement shall be limited under subsection (b) if the infringer sustains the burden of proving, and the court finds, that––

"(A) before the infringing use of the work began, the infringer, a person acting on behalf of the infringer, or any person jointly and severally liable with the infringer for the infringement of the work––

"(i) performed and documented a reasonably diligent search in good faith to locate the owner of the infringed copyright; but
"(ii) was unable to locate the owne and

"(B) the infringing use of the work provided attribution, in a manner reasonable under the circumstances, to the author and owner of the copyright, if known with a reasonable degree of certainty based on information obtained in performing the reasonably diligent search.

" (2) DEFINITIONS; REQUIREMENTS FOR 7
SEARCHES.––

"(A) OWNER OF INFRINGED COPYRIGHT.––
For purposes of paragraph (1), the 'owner' of an infringed copyright in a work is the legal or beneficial owner of, or any party with authority to grant or license, an exclusive right under section 106 applicable to the infringement.

"(B) REQUIREMENTS FOR REASONABLY DILIGENT SEARCH.––(i) For purposes of paragraph (1), a search to locate the owner of an infringed copyright in a work––

"(I) is 'reasonably diligent' only if it includes steps that are reasonable under
the circumstances to locate that owner in order to obtain permission for the use of the work; and

"(II) is not 'reasonably diligent' solely by reference to the lack of identifying information with respect to the copyright on the copy or phonorecord of the work.

" (ii) The steps referred to in clause (i)(I) shall ordinarily include, at a minimum, review of the information maintained by the Register of Copyrights under subparagraph (C).

"(iii) A reasonably diligent search includes the use of reasonably available expert assistance and reasonably available technology, which may include, if reasonable under the circumstances, resources for which a charge or subscription fee is imposed.

"(C) INFORMATION TO GUIDE SEARCHES.––The Register of Copyrights shall receive, maintain, and make available to the public, including through the Internet, information from authoritative sources, such as industry guidelines, statements of best practices, and other relevant documents, that is designed to assist users in conducting and documenting a reasonably diligent search under this subsection. Such information may include––

" (i) the records of the Copyright Office that are relevant to identifying and locating copyright owners;

" (ii) other sources of copyright ownership information reasonably available to users;

"(iii) methods to identify copyright ownership information associated with a work;

"(iv) sources of reasonably available technology tools and reasonably available expert assistance; and

"(v) best practices for documenting a reasonably diligent search.

"(b) LIMITATIONS ON REMEDIES––The limitations on remedies in a case to which subsection (a) applies are the following:

"(1) MONETARY RELIEF.–– 15

"(A) GENERAL RULE.––Subject to sub-paragraph (B), an award for monetary relief (including actual damages, statutory damages, costs, and attorney's fees) may not be made, other than an order requiring the infringer to pay reasonable compensation for the use of the infringed work.

"(B) EXCEPTIONS.––(i) An order requiring the infringer to pay reasonable compensation for the use of the infringed work may not be made under subparagraph (A) if––

"(I) the infringement is performed without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and primarily for a charitable, religious, scholarly, or educational purpose, and

"(II) the infringer ceases the infringement expeditiously after receiving notice of the claim for infringement, unless the copyright owner proves, and the court finds, that the infringer has earned proceeds directly attributable to the infringement.

"(ii) If the infringer fails to negotiate in good faith with the owner of the infringed work regarding the amount of reasonable compensation for the use of the infringed work, the court may award full costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee, against the infringer under section 505, subject to section 412.

"(2) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.––

"(A) GENERAL RULE.––Subject to sub-paragraph (B), the court may impose injunctive relief to prevent or restrain the infringing use, except that, if the infringer has met the requirements of subsection (a), the relief shall, to the extent practicable, account for any harm that the relief would cause the infringer due to its reliance on having performed a reasonably diligent search under subsection (a).

"(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR NEW WORKS.––In a case in which the infringer recasts, transforms, adapts, or integrates the infringed work with the infringer's original expression in a new work of authorship, the court may not, in 10
granting injunctive relief, restrain the infringer's continued preparation or use of that new 12
work, if the infringer––

" (i) pays reasonable compensation to the owner of the infringed copyright for the use of the infringed work; and

"(ii) provides attribution to the owner of the infringed copyright in a manner that the court determines is reasonable under the circumstances.

"(C) TREATMENT OF PARTIES NOT SUBJECT TO SUIT.––The limitations on remedies under this paragraph shall not be available to an infringer that asserts in an action under section 501(b) that neither it nor its representative acting in an official capacity is subject to suit in Federal court for an award of damages to the copyright owner under section 504, unless the court finds that such infringer has––

"(i) complied with the requirements of subsection (a) of this section;

"(ii) made a good faith offer of compensation that was rejected by the copyright owner; and

"(iii) affirmed in writing its willingness to pay such compensation to the copy- right owner upon the determination by the court that such compensation was reasonable under paragraph (3) of this subsection.

"(D) CONSTRUCTION.––Nothing in subparagraph (C) shall be deemed to authorize or require, and no action taken pursuant to subparagraph (C) shall be deemed to constitute, an award of damages by the court against the infringer.

"(E) RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES NOT WAIVED.––No action taken by an infringer pursuant to subparagraph (C) shall be deemed to waive any right or privilege that, as a matter of law, protects such infringer from being subject to suit in Federal court for an award of damages to the copyright owner under section 504.

"(3) REASONABLE COMPENSATION.––In establishing reasonable compensation under paragraph (1) or (2), the owner of the infringed copyright has the burden of establishing the amount on which a reasonable willing buyer and a reasonable willing seller in the positions of the owner and the infringer would have agreed with respect to the infringing use of the work immediately before the infringement began.

"(c) PRESERVATION OF OTHER RIGHTS, LIMITA- 13
TIONS, AND DEFENSE.––This section does not affect any right, limitation, or defense to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title. If another provision of this title provides for a statutory license when the copy- right owner cannot be located, that provision applies in lieu of this section.

"(d) COPYRIGHT FOR DERIVATIVE WORKS.––Not-withstanding section 103(a), the infringing use of a work in accordance with this section shall not limit or affect the copyright protection for a work that uses the infringed work."

"(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.––The table of sections for chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

514. Limitation on remedies in cases involving orphan works."

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.––The amendments made by this section shall apply only to infringing uses that commence on or after June 1, 2008.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON AMENDMENTS. 7

The Register of Copyrights shall, not later than December 12, 2014, report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate on the implementation and effects of the amendments made by section 2, including any recommendations for legislative changes that the Register considers appropriate.

SEC. 4. INQUIRY ON REMEDIES FOR SMALL COPYRIGHT CLAIMS.

(a) IN GENERAL.––The Register of Copyrights shall conduct an inquiry with respect to remedies for copyright infringement claims seeking limited amounts of monetary relief, including consideration of alternatives to disputes currently heard in the United States district courts. The inquiry shall cover infringement claims to which section 514 of title 17, United States Code (as added by section 2 of this Act), apply, and other infringement claims under title 17, United States Code.

(b) PROCEDURES.––The Register of Copyrights shall publish notice of the inquiry under subsection (a), providing a period during which interested persons may submit comments on the inquiry, and an opportunity for interested persons to participate in public roundtables on the inquiry. The Register shall hold the public roundtables at such times as the Register considers appropriate.

(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.ÑThe Register of Copyrights shall, not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, prepare and submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on the inquiry conducted under this section, including such recommendations that the Register considers appropriate.

Proposed Orphan Works Legislation . . .

(Editor's note: the proposed orphan works legislation below was submitted to Congress by the U.S. Copyright Office in January.)

SECTION 514: LIMITATIONS ON REMEDIES: ORPHAN WORKS
(a) Notwithstanding sections 502 through 505, where the infringer:
(1) prior to the commencement of the infringement, performed a good faith, reasonably diligent search to locate the owner of the infringed copyright and the infringer did not locate that owner, and
(2) throughout the course of the infringement, provided attribution to the author and copyright owner of the work, if possible and as appropriate under the circumstances, the remedies for the infringement shall be limited as set forth in subsection (b).
(b) LIMITATIONS ON REMEDIES
(1) MONETARY RELIEF
(A) no award for monetary damages (including actual damages, statutory damages, costs or attorney’s fees) shall be made other than an order requiring the infringer to pay reasonable compensation for the use of the infringed work; provided, however, that where the infringement is performed without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage, such as through the sale of copies or phonorecords of the infringed work, and the infringer ceases the infringement expeditiously after receiving notice of the claim for infringement, no award of monetary relief shall be made.
(2) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(A) in the case where the infringer has prepared or commenced preparation of a derivative work that recasts, transforms or adapts the infringed work
with a significant amount of the infringer’s expression, any injunctive or equitable relief granted by the court shall not restrain the infringer’s continued preparation and use of the derivative work, provided that the infringer makes payment of reasonable compensation to the copyright owner for such preparation and ongoing use and provides attribution to the author and copyright owner in a manner determined by the court as reasonable under the circumstances; and
(B) in all other cases, the court may impose injunctive relief to prevent or restrain the infringement in its entirety, but the relief shall to the extent practicable account for any harm that the relief would cause the infringer due to the infringer’s reliance on this section in making the infringing use.
(c) Nothing in this section shall affect rights, limitations or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title.
(d) This section shall not apply to any infringement occurring after the date that is ten years from date of enactment of this Act.

Many organizations would like you to make your feelings about the orphan works issue known to congress. To make this easier, The Stock Asylum has compiled contact information for both congressional subcommittees charged with considering the proposal.

The Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property (click here) includes the following members:

Orrin G. Hatch, UT(Chairman)
104 Hart Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.5251
Fax: 202.224.6331

Jon Kyl (R) Arizona
730 Hart Senate Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
202.224.4521
Fax: 202.224.2207

Mike DeWine (R) Ohio
140 Russell Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.2315
Fax: 202.224.6519

Lindsey O. Graham (R) S. Carolina
290 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.5972

John Cornyn (R) Texas
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.2934
Fax: 202.228.2856

Sam Brownback (R) Kansas
303 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
202.224.6521
Fax: 202.228.1265

Tom Coburn (R) Oklahoma
172 Russell Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.5754
Fax: 202.224.6008

Patrick Leahy (D) Vermont Ranking Democrat
433 Russell Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
202.244.4242

Edward M. Kennedy (D) Massachusetts
317 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington DC 20510
202.224.4543
Fax: 202.224.2417

Joseph R. Biden, JR., l (D) Delaware
201 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
202.224.5042
Fax: 202.224.0139

Dianne Feinstein (D) California
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.3841
Fax: 202.228.3954

Herbert Kohl (D) Wisconsin
330 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
202.224.5653
Fax: 202.224.9787

Richard J. Durbin (D) Illinois
332 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.2152
Fax: 202.228.0400


The U. S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property (click here)
includes the following members:

Lamar S. Smith
Chairman
(R) Texas, 21st
2184 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.4236

Henry J. Hyde
(R) Illinois, 6th
2110 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.4561

Elton Gallegly
(R) California, 24th
2427 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-0523
202.225.5811

Bob Goodlatte
(R) Virginia, 6th
2240 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.5431

William L. Jenkins
(R) Tennessee, 1st
1207 Longworth Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.6356

Spencer Bachus
(R) Alabama, 6th
442 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
202.225.4921

Robert D. Inglis
(R) South Carolina, 4th
330 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.6030

Ric Keller
(R) Florida, 8th
419 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.2176

Darrell E. Issa
(R) California, 49th
211 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
e-mail

Chris Cannon
(R) Utah, 3rd
2436 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.7751

Mike Pence
(R) Indiana, 6th
426 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.3021

Randy Forbes
(R) Virginia, 4th
307 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.6365

Howard L. Berman
Ranking Member
(D) California, 28th
2221 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
202.225.4695

John Conyers Jr.
(D) Michigan, 14th
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.5126

Rick Boucher
(D) Virginia, 9th
2187 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.3861

Zoe Lofgren
(D) California, 16th
102 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.3072

Maxine Waters
(D) California, 35th
2344 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.2201

Martin T. Meehan
(D) Massachusetts, 5th
2229 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.3411

Robert Wexler
(D) Florida, 19th
213 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.3001

Anthony D. Weiner
(D) New York, 9th
1122 Longworth House Office Building
Washington DC 20515
202.225.6616

Adam B. Schiff
(D) California, 29th
326 Cannon House Office Building
Washington D.C. 20515
202.225.4176

Linda T. Sánchez
(D) California, 39th
1007 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.6676

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHTS HOW TO USE THIS SITE IMAGE CATALOG